mac makeup the case of the same locations

1, identified Mr. Zhang Wang picked up the missing ring is on what basis? Just because Ms. Wang lost a ring in the parking lot and Mr. Zhang had a ring picked up in the parking lot? Obviously, this evidence is not sufficient. Because in order to prove that Mr. Chang Wang picked up the ring is missing, we must first have evidence that Mr. Zhang and Ms. Wang picked up the location of the ring where the ring is missing the same, or can pick up that Mr. Zhang is also a false rings, missing rings and Wang do not know  mac brushes, perhaps in parking lot, others may be seized. Secondly, mac makeup  the case of the same locations, but also there is evidence that Mr. Zhang and Ms. Wang picked up the ring, the ring lost exactly the same in appearance, otherwise, is not that Mr. Chang Wang picked up the missing ring. Again, even if the same location, the appearance of the ring, too, can prove that the same material? Has not been found before in the ring can not be clearly identified.
2,4.6 million loss of value can not be identified. Because the ring was not found before the value can not be assessed. Even if the owner can show the invoice proof of Ms. Wang had bought a ring worth 46,000 yuan, but  north face denali  can not conclude that the ring is lost. Even if the invoices made clear and detailed description of the appearance of material, not found in the ring before the video surveillance alone can not prove lost ring is that an invoice, even if the appearance is very similar, but can not prove material. even if, as is the judge recognized the value of 46,000 yuan While this ring, the   insanity workout  can not be completely lost was picked up by the take-off Zhang. Supreme People's Court on the implementation of the Keepers shall promptly notify the right owner to take, or sent to public security departments. One hundred and tenth one, Lost in the lost property to the relevant authority before the relevant departments were receiving before the lost property, shall keep the lost property. Caused deliberately or by gross negligence Lost damaged or lost, shall bear civil liability. So Mr. Zhang